Contract Glossary
Unjust Enrichment
Definition
Unjust enrichment is a legal principle that prevents one party from unfairly profiting at another's expense. If someone receives a benefit they didn't pay for and keeping it would be unjust, courts can order them to pay — even without a written contract.
In Practice
A freelance designer creates a full brand identity for a startup based on verbal discussions. The startup uses the logos and templates but refuses to pay because 'there was no signed contract.' The court orders the startup to pay the reasonable value of the design work.
Common in these contract types
Related terms
Related articles
5 Clauses Every Service Agreement Needs
The five non-negotiable clauses in any service agreement — scope, payment, liability, termination, and dispute resolution. Skip one and you are exposed.
Contractor vs Employee Contract: Key Differences Every Business Owner Must Know
Understand the critical differences between contractor and employee contracts. Misclassification risks, tax implications, and how to choose the right agreement for your business.
How to Write a Service Agreement That Protects Both Parties
Write a service agreement that protects both parties. Covers scope, payment, liability caps, SLAs, and termination clauses.
Frequently asked questions about unjust enrichment
Three elements: (1) the defendant received a benefit, (2) the defendant knew about or appreciated the benefit, and (3) it would be unjust for the defendant to keep the benefit without paying.
Create a contract with proper unjust enrichment clauses
Generate a professional contract in minutes with all the essential clauses — no legal expertise needed.
Create your contractThis content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For contracts with significant financial or legal implications, review by a qualified attorney is recommended.