Skip to main content

Contract Glossary

Unconscionability

Definition

A legal doctrine that allows courts to refuse to enforce a contract (or a specific clause) that is so unfair, one-sided, or oppressive that no reasonable person would have agreed to it and no fair person would have offered it. Courts examine both procedural unconscionability (how the contract was formed — hidden terms, pressure, lack of choice) and substantive unconscionability (the terms themselves — grossly unfair pricing, one-sided penalties, or waiver of important rights).

In Practice

A moving company's contract includes a clause buried on page 8 in 6-point font: 'Customer waives all claims for damage to property and agrees that the maximum liability of the Company shall not exceed $50, regardless of the value of goods moved.' The customer doesn't notice the clause and signs. Their $50,000 piano is dropped and destroyed during the move. A court could find the clause unconscionable — both procedurally (hidden in fine print, no negotiation opportunity) and substantively ($50 cap for potentially unlimited damage). The clause could be struck, and the customer could recover full damages.

Frequently asked questions about unconscionability

Courts look at two factors: (1) Procedural unconscionability — unfairness in how the contract was formed: fine print, take-it-or-leave-it terms, unequal bargaining power, high-pressure tactics, or complex language designed to confuse. (2) Substantive unconscionability — unfairness in the actual terms: grossly one-sided obligations, excessive penalties, waiver of important rights, or unreasonable price. Most courts require both elements, though one can be strong enough to compensate for a weaker showing of the other.

Create a contract with proper unconscionability clauses

Generate a professional contract in minutes with all the essential clauses — no legal expertise needed.

Create your contract

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For contracts with significant financial or legal implications, review by a qualified attorney is recommended.